Friday, October 30, 2015
Thursday, October 29, 2015
Wednesday, October 28, 2015
Tuesday, October 27, 2015
Monday, October 26, 2015
Friday, October 23, 2015
Thursday, October 22, 2015
Wednesday, October 21, 2015
Monday, October 19, 2015
Friday, October 16, 2015
Thursday, October 15, 2015
Tuesday, October 13, 2015
Thursday, October 8, 2015
Why not let Russia lead in Syria?
Why not let Russia get bogged down in Syria and spend all kinds of money on fighting "terrorists" and then more money to rebuild if they actually win?
The United States has no clear strategy in Syria. We are spending billions and don't even know what we really want for an outcome, except perhaps for the removal of Assad. This is probably not going to happen as we are not sending troops and Russia supports Assad. Sure, we want to get rid of ISIS, but we're not doing that very well.
Why not make a deal with Russia that allows those who want to leave Syria leave; agree to secure borders of surrounding states; and let Russia get deeper in the whole with ISIS? Syria is of no particular strategic value to the U.S. Let Russia create another Afghanistan/Vietnam that will keep them occupied for many years to come and save us lots of money. Assad will eventually self-implode and Russia will have to clean up the mess.
Wednesday, October 7, 2015
Tuesday, October 6, 2015
Friday, October 2, 2015
Thursday, October 1, 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)